I recently had the singular experience of reading Thomas Umstattd’s long blog post on why dating is so superior to that fundamentally flawed institution known as courtship. Like me, he’s a former homeschooler, so I really, really wanted to like what he wrote, but there were a couple of things that disturbed me in his article. Here are a few:
-His legalistic approach to relationships
-His extreme naiveté about our hypersexualized culture
-His idolization of dating, even to the level of salvation
Those are the major things. There were also a few minor
things that scared me, like the announcement at the end that said, “This post
is turning into a book!”
There have been a couple of responses already written to
Umstattd’s post, such as one by Scott Ross and another on Boundless, but none
of the ones I read have addressed it from the perspective I am writing from.
Let’s just dive right in to part one.
The first major problem I noticed was Umstattd’s strong
legalism. In a response post, he later claimed that he does not advocate a
legalistic approach to relationships. However, I must point out that he
mentions nothing of consulting God through prayer in the process of finding a
spouse, and he does not consult what the Scriptures say about marriage and how
we ought to treat one another. Any approach lacking such an important relational
element while attempting to maintain purity will eventually dissolve into
legalism. (Tweet this.) Guess what? Legalism is one of the reasons he calls courtship
‘fundamentally flawed’:
“The deal was that if we put up with the rules and
awkwardness of courtship now we could avoid the pain of divorce later. The
whole point of courtship was to have a happy marriage, not a high divorce
rate.”
Really? The whole point of courtship is to have a happy
marriage? Not to serve God and submit your budding romance to his Lordship?
There is no guarantee that a marriage may be happy. Personal baggage aside,
difficulties regarding health, finances, and child-rearing may put inordinate
amounts of strain on a marriage. A couple who is consciously choosing to submit
to Christ and obey his command to love one another will have the grace to make
it through the trials of life. A couple who enters such trials thinking that
they earned their fairytale because they courted will be in for a sore awakening,
and might not pass through unscathed.
And what is this about ‘putting up with rules’? Does his
circle of courters have strict rules about things like kisses, holding hands,
and how closely a chaperone has to follow them? And this is considered a godly
relationship model? When you try to live out a godly relationship with rules
set by anything other than Scripture and your own personal convictions, you are
trying to make a relationship godly by your own power – NOT by relying on the
power of Christ.
I submit to you that Umstattd’s approach to romance is
fundamentally flawed. Rules do not a deep relationship make. (Tweet this.) This applies not
just to romance but also to our relationship with God. Hosea 6:6 says “For I
desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgement of God rather than burnt
offerings.” God doesn’t want your church attendance, your good behavior, and
10% of your income; he wants you. The former can be given without the latter,
but the latter cannot be given without also the former.
What, then is the correct approach? Find a mate who shares the
same values with you; being equally yoked is certainly important to the
longevity of any relationship. Pray about it. Most importantly, entrust it to
God. He is the creator of romance, after all; he will breathe fire and life in
the fairytale he’ll bring you, if you allow him to do so. This applies even if
you are called to be celibate; profound relational intimacy with the Lord our
God is something that many people desire but not many have.
“But are we allowed to kiss? Are we allowed to do _____
before we’re married?” you may ask.
You are asking the wrong questions. How about this:
“How can we serve God and each other? Can we kiss innocently
or is that something that would hinder our sanctification and exercise of
self-control?” Those are marginally better, though I can’t say they’re the
ultimate.
How about this: “What is the unselfish choice?” Get yourself
in the habit of asking that, and you will daily realize how much you must fight
against the natural inclinations of your sin nature. I asked myself that after
a dear friend and companion asked me out on a date. I realized that the only
reasons I had for saying no were selfish ones regarding fear of possible
heartbreak, and I had plenty of good reasons to say yes. Someone else may have
selfish reasons to say yes and plenty of good reasons to say no. You can’t put
a formula on following God, and that includes relationship choices. (Tweet this.)
No comments:
Post a Comment